[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200807281053.58267.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 10:53:57 +1000
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mike Travis <travis@....com>
Subject: Re: [git pull] cpus4096 fixes
On Monday 28 July 2008 05:06:01 Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Linus,
>
> Please pull the latest cpus4096-fixes git tree from:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip.git
> cpus4096
>
> this fixes the cpumask_of_cpu API fallout described here:
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/23/76
>
> ... and the fix is wider than i'd like it to be, so close to -rc1
Sorry, it's wider because you pushed the last stupid Mike patch. Over my
(obviously too-polite) objections. Most of this is reverting that, just
without actually admitting it.
> - but
> it's the cleanest one and it has Rusty's ack as well.
Not really. As authored, I intended it as a bandaid for systems with small
CPU numbers. Mike made it always on (tho __initdata on large x86 systems),
which IMHO is insane (2MB of initdata?).
Mike: I now think the right long-term answer is Linus' dense cpumap idea + a
convenience allocator for cpumasks. We sweep the kernel for all on-stack
vars and replace them with one or the other. Thoughts?
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists