[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080728150634.GC32111@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:06:34 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: x86 tracehook
* Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com> wrote:
> Hi! The generic tracehook patches were merged, so now the arch stuff
> can go in any time. These are the pending x86 changes. The only
> difference from what I posted before are fixing up some tiny syntax
> nits in syscall.h that made gcc-3.x unhappy.
>
> Sorry Ingo, I had already done this with git-rebase before I read your
> admonition about that today. (Anyway, the prerequisite tracehook
> series went in via patches rather than a GIT merge, so I don't think
> the x86/tracehook branch forked from my own tracehook branch could
> still have been used.)
that's OK. It only gets painful once someone starts relying on a branch.
> The following changes since commit 8be1a6d6c77ab4532e4476fdb8177030ef48b52c:
> Linus Torvalds (1):
> Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/.../roland/infiniband
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/frob/linux-2.6-utrace.git x86-tracehook
>
> Roland McGrath (6):
> x86: tracehook_signal_handler
> x86: tracehook syscall
> x86: tracehook: asm/syscall.h
> x86 signals: use asm/syscall.h
> x86: tracehook: TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME
> x86: tracehook: CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK
pulled into tip/x86/tracehook - thanks Roland!
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists