[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <7949EA87-4340-4353-AFC9-79A718B95DF0@holtmann.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 03:13:21 +0200
From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sfr@...b.auug.org.au,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, kkeil@...e.de
Subject: Re: mISDN still breaking the allmodconfig build...
Hi Dave,
>>> More fallout from the premature mISDN driver merge:
>>>
>>> drivers/isdn/hardware/mISDN/hfcmulti.c:5255:2: error: #error "not
>>> running on big endian machines now"
>>
>> is that only the HFC driver or the whole mISDN stack?
>>
>> I know that the two old ISDN stacks where really bad on big endian,
>> but my assumption was that we did sort this out in the end.
>
> One of the two mISDN drivers uses the deprecated virt_to_bus()
> interface for handling DMA addresses (that doesn't even work on many
> x86 systems these days) and the other mISDN driver gives the above
> big-endian compile time error.
>
> In short, this driver was not ready for merging at all.
I am not defending it and agree that this driver should have had at
least one test run in linux-next. However mISDN is a whole ISDN stack.
So does mISDN has an issue too or do we only have a really broken
driver. Karsten?
Regards
Marcel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists