[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080729012656.566F.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 01:27:44 +0900
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: righi.andrea@...il.com
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm: unify pmd_free() implementation
> yep! clear.
>
> Ok, in this case wouldn't be better at least to define pud_free() as:
>
> static inline pud_free(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd)
> {
> }
I also like this :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists