[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <488DFFD2.7070004@qualcomm.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 10:20:18 -0700
From: Max Krasnyansky <maxk@...lcomm.com>
To: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
CC: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
menage@...gle.com, seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com,
laijs@...fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] cpuset: clean up cpuset hierarchy traversal code
Paul Jackson wrote:
> Li Zefan wrote:
>> - q = kfifo_alloc(number_of_cpusets * sizeof(cp), GFP_KERNEL, NULL);
>
>
> The block comment for rebuild_sched_domains() states:
>
>> ... May take callback_mutex during
>> * call due to the kfifo_alloc() and kmalloc() calls.
>
> I suspect that mention of kfifo_alloc() is no longer correct,
> with your patch. If so, perhaps you could send a little additional
> fix patch, to remove that mention from the comment.
>
Paul, please take a look at
cpuset: Rework sched domains and CPU hotplug handling
patch I sent out last week.
I'd appreciate if we applied that one first. It simplifies lock nesting
and rearranges the way sched domains are rebuilt. It is IMO a bit higher
priority than this patch because scheduler depends on the
rebuild_sched_domains() call and we have to call rebuild_sched_domains()
from cpu hotplug handlers.
Max
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists