linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] leds: Support OpenFirmware led bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0807281204250.26456@t2.domain.actdsltmp>
Date:	Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:11:01 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Trent Piepho <tpiepho@...escale.com>
To:	Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>
cc:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] leds: Support OpenFirmware led bindings

On Mon, 28 Jul 2008, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 11:26:28AM -0700, Trent Piepho wrote:
>> On Mon, 28 Jul 2008, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 11:09:14AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>>>>> +- function :  (optional) This parameter, if present, is a string
>>>>>>> +  defining the function of the LED.  It can be used to put the LED
>>>>>>> +  under software control, e.g. Linux LED triggers like "heartbeat",
>>>>>>> +  "ide-disk", and "timer".  Or it could be used to attach a hardware
>>>>>>> +  signal to the LED, e.g. a SoC that can configured to put a SATA
>>>>>>> +  activity signal on a GPIO line.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This makes me nervous.  It exposes Linux internal implementation details
>>>>>> into the device tree data.  If you want to have a property that
>>>>>> describes the LED usage, then the possible values and meanings should be
>>>>>> documented here.
>>>>>
>>>>> Should it be a linux specific property then?  I could list all the current
>>>>> linux triggers, but enumerating every possible function someone might want
>>>>> to assign to an LED seems hopeless.
>>>>
>>>> I'd rather see the device tree provide 'hints' toward the expected usage
>>>> and if a platform needs something specific, then the platform specific
>>>> code should setup the trigger.
>>>>
>>> Maybe we can encode leds into devices themselves, via phandles?
>>
>> How will this work for anything besides ide activity?  For example, flashing,
>> heartbeat, default on, overheat, fan failed, kernel panic, etc.
>
> Everything is possible, but will look weird. For example,
>
> Default on (power led) could be encoded in the root node.
> fan and overheat in a PM controller's node.
> Kernel panic in the chosen node.

What about flashing?  What if the sensor chip isn't an OF device?

>>> And then the OF GPIO LEDs driver could do something like:
>>>
>>> char *ide_disk_trigger_compatibles[] = {
>>> 	"fsl,sata",
>>> 	"ide-generic",
>>> 	...
>>> };
>>
>> Everytime someone added a new ide driver, this table would have to be updated.
>
> Yes. device_type would be helpful here. :-)
>
>
> Well, otherwise, we could provide a trigger map in the chosen node:
>
> chosen {
> 	/* leds map: default-on, ide-disk, nand-disk, panic */
> 	linux,leds = <&green_led &red_led 0 0>;
> };

What if you have multiple leds that you want to be default on?  What happens
when new functions are added?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/