[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080728193235.GB11431@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 21:32:35 +0200
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Alex Nixon (Intern)" <Alex.Nixon@...citrix.com>,
Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen: xen: compile irq functions without -pg for ftrace
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 11:53:57AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> For some reason I managed to miss a bunch of irq-related functions
> which also need to be compiled without -pg when using ftrace. This
> patch moves them into their own file, and starts a cleanup process
> I've been meaning to do anyway.
>
> [ Sam, Ingo: I think the problem was that I enabled CONFIG_FTRACE
> but didn't do a clean build. Shouldn't the build-system notice
> that the config changes the CFLAGS and rebuild everything? That
> didn't seem to happen in this case. ]
The build system usually does this.
And I have no reports that this has regressed until now.
What file?
Can you tell me how to reproduce it?
>
> ===================================================================
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/Makefile
> @@ -2,9 +2,10 @@
> # Do not profile debug and lowlevel utilities
> CFLAGS_REMOVE_spinlock.o = -pg
> CFLAGS_REMOVE_time.o = -pg
> +CFLAGS_REMOVE_irq.o = -pg
> endif
I already NACK'ed this syntax and described the way it should be done.
Is this ignored or on a TODO list?
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists