linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5] Move elfcorehdr_addr out of vmcore.c (Was: Re: [patch] crashdump: fix undefined reference to `elfcorehdr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080729032639.GA4356@verge.net.au>
Date:	Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:26:41 +1000
From:	Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
To:	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Muli Ben-Yehuda <muli@...ibm.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
	Chandru <chandru@...ibm.com>, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Terry Loftin <terry.loftin@...com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] Move elfcorehdr_addr out of vmcore.c (Was: Re:
	[patch] crashdump: fix undefined reference to `elfcorehdr_addr')

On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:28:22PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 11:22:48AM +1000, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 03:47:41PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > > Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com> writes:
> > > 
> > > > Hi All,
> > > >
> > > > How does following series of patches look like. I have moved
> > > > elfcorehdr_addr out of vmcore.c and pushed it to arch dependent section 
> > > > of crash dump to make sure that it can be worked with even when
> > > > CONFIG_PROC_VMCORE is disabled and CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP is enabled.
> > > >
> > > > I tested it on x86_64. Compile tested it on i386 and ppc64. ia64 and
> > > > sh versions are completely untested.
> > > 
> > > Given the current state of the code:
> > > Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
> > > 
> > > To process a kernel crash dump we pass the kernel elfcorehdr option,
> > > so testing to see if it was passed seems reasonable.
> > > 
> > > In general I think this method of handling the problems with kdump is
> > > too brittle to live, but in the case of iommus we certainly need to do
> > > something different, and unfortunately iommus were not common on x86
> > > when the original code was merged so we have not handled them well.
> > 
> > Agreed, however these patches look like they really ought to be merged
> > into a single patch for the sake of bisect. As things stand, applying
> > the first patch will break the build on each architecture with an
> > architecture specific until the latter is applied.
> 
> That's a good point. I was not very sure because changes were in 
> different arches and I broke the patch. At the same time changes are
> really miniscule in each arch. 

I guessed that was why you split them up. But really the
per-arch change is very small.

> So, for the sake of not breaking compilation for git-bisect, I will
> generate a single patch tomorrow. (Until and unless somebody has an
> objection).

For combiled patch:

Acked-by: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>

-- 
Horms

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/