[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080729144330C.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:42:48 +0900
From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: sfr@...b.auug.org.au, fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp, mingo@...e.hu,
joerg.roedel@....com, mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
bhavna.sarathy@....com, robert.richter@....com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add iommu_num_pages helper function
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 22:24:39 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:56:52 +1000
>
> > Um, did you see the linux-next build report I posted (possibly not):
> >
> > arch/powerpc/kernel/iommu.c:56: error: static declaration of 'iommu_num_pages' follows non-static declaration
> > include/linux/iommu-helper.h:11: error: previous declaration of 'iommu_num_pages' was here
> >
> > This is now a build of 2.6.27-rc1 for powerpc64 ppc64_defconfig ...
>
> It breaks sparc64 the same exact way. :-/
Yeah, it breaks both. It's not a proper helper function that all the
architectures can use so how about making it x86 stuff?
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121730644704448&w=2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists