[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080729065635.27630e33@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 06:56:35 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Frederik Deweerdt <deweerdt@...e.fr>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
suresh.b.siddha@...el.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
00000002
On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:09:11 +0200
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 06:22:15AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-07-29 at 00:26 +0200, Frederik Deweerdt wrote:
> > > Hello Aneesh,
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 03:23:17PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > > > [ 163.378265] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer
> > > > dereference at 00000002 [ 163.378276] IP: [<c0124933>]
> > > > sched_power_savings_store+0x13/0x70
> > >
> > > Does the attached patch solve the problem?
> >
> > Patch seems to have missed the boat for rc1 too.
>
> Hmm. I'll resend.
>
> BTW i think it's clearly a bug that distributions are even accessing
> that file. It doesn't make any sense in the context they are using
> it (like at every boot).
it's a power saving feature that they very likely turn on by default...
--
If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@...ux.intel.com
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists