[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080729175407.GA30245@erda.amd.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:54:07 +0200
From: Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Jason Yeh <jason.yeh@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
oprofile-list <oprofile-list@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Oprofile Multiplexing Patch
On 26.07.08 13:16:26, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > From: Jason Yeh <jason.yeh@....com>
>
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_p4.c b/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_p4.c
> > index 56b4757..e641545 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_p4.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_p4.c
> > @@ -701,6 +701,8 @@ static void p4_shutdown(struct op_msrs const * const msrs)
> > struct op_x86_model_spec const op_p4_ht2_spec = {
> > .num_counters = NUM_COUNTERS_HT2,
> > .num_controls = NUM_CONTROLS_HT2,
> > + .num_hardware_counters = NUM_COUNTERS_HT2,
> > + .num_hardware_controls = NUM_CONTROLS_HT2,
>
> is there any further change needed for Intel CPUs to benefit from
> multiplexing too, up to the max of 32 controls? (AFAICS it should work
> as-is, correct?)
I would like to wait with this change until the code base is
stable. There could be some follow-up changes that would require more
rework then.
-Robert
>
> Ingo
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating System Research Center
email: robert.richter@....com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists