[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86802c440807291113u59ba996dg340c8feba1039f3a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 11:13:16 -0700
From: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
To: "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: "Cliff Wickman" <cpw@....com>,
"Nick Piggin" <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>, steiner@....com,
mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Comments on UV tlb flushing
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 7:43 AM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> wrote:
> Cliff Wickman wrote:
>>
>> I think that the Linux distributions are not going to build a special
>> UV kernel, are they? So every distro would have to be prompted to turn on
>> CONFIG_X86_UV, or else their kernel is not going to boot on UV.
>>
>
> Distros will generally turn on everything. You could have it on by default
> if the kernel is built for CONFIG_X86_GENERICARCH which enables support for
> other big numa configurations. I think distros generally build with that
> enabled anyway.
config X86_GENERICARCH
bool "Generic architecture"
depends on X86_32
help
This option compiles in the NUMAQ, Summit, bigsmp, ES7000, default
subarchitectures. It is intended for a generic binary kernel.
if you select them all, kernel will probe it one by one. and will
fallback to default.
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists