linux-kernel - Re: [patch 2/4] Configure out file locking features

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080729200006.GA25885@shareable.org>
Date:	Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:00:08 +0100
From:	Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>
To:	Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
Cc:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/4] Configure out file locking features

Matt Mackall wrote:
> The typical embedded NFS-based devices are NAS servers and media players
> and are going to be more concerned about things like page cache
> balancing.

Oh, those.

It would be really annoying to buy a home NAS and find it doesn't
support NFS locks or SMB oplocks.  NASes are vaguely useful for more
than one computer in the house at the same time.

That said, I bought a big, expensive one, found it far too slow for my
needs, send it back for a refund and bought a portable cheap USB disk
which had *so* much higher performance.  The convenience of serving
multiple machines just wasn't worth the lousy performance.

-- Jamie
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/