linux-kernel - Re: Regression on ia64 with cpu masks: optimize and clean up cpumask_of

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080729231842.GH6370@verge.net.au>
Date:	Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:18:42 +1000
From:	Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
To:	Mike Travis <travis@....com>
Cc:	Linux-kernel <Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Regression on ia64 with cpu masks: optimize and clean up
	cpumask_of_cpu()

On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 08:33:06AM -0700, Mike Travis wrote:
> Check linux-next, I believe the exact same fix is in there.  Apparently,
> as Stephen and others have pointed out earlier, that syntax isn't evaluated 
> correctly in earlier gcc's (at least earlier then the 4. series).

Thanks, confirmed.

dde108a23e4bf6d6d225ae18c64abeaf85fe2b50 in linux-next includes
the same fix that I stumbled upon.

-- 
Horms

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/