[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <488FAB2B.7050405@zytor.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:43:39 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
CC: "mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"arjan@...ux.intel.com" <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
"roland@...hat.com" <roland@...hat.com>,
"drepper@...hat.com" <drepper@...hat.com>,
"mikpe@...uu.se" <mikpe@...uu.se>,
"chrisw@...s-sol.org" <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
"andi@...stfloor.org" <andi@...stfloor.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/9] x86, xsave: xsave/xrstor support
Suresh Siddha wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 04:09:12PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> Applied as tip:x86/xsave.
>>
>> I should warn I had to do quite a bit of manual fixup in order to
>> disentangle it from other changes in -tip, so please test it out; I
>> compile-tested it but for obvious reasons can't do more than that at the
>> moment.
>
> hpa, these patches just apply fine to tip/master. Can you please arrange
> the tip/x86/xsave tree accordingly? or do I need to do something else
> to smooth this process?
This is awkward, since that means this is "derived topic". Most of the
changes are orthogonal and relatively trivial to fix up at merge time,
so I would prefer to keep them separate.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists