[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080730005853.3f343d93.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:58:53 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Sven Wegener <sven.wegener@...aler.net>
Cc: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>, Rod Whitby <rod@...tby.id.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds-fsg: Change order of initialization and
deinitialization
On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 20:30:59 +0200 (CEST) Sven Wegener <sven.wegener@...aler.net> wrote:
> --- a/drivers/leds/leds-fsg.c
> +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-fsg.c
> @@ -161,6 +161,16 @@ static int fsg_led_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> int ret;
>
> + /* Map the LED chip select address space */
> + latch_address = (unsigned short *) ioremap(IXP4XX_EXP_BUS_BASE(2), 512);
> + if (!latch_address) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto failremap;
> + }
> +
> + latch_value = 0xffff;
> + *latch_address = latch_value;
Mutter. Shouldn't this driver be using readw/writew? It's not even
using a volatile pointer, so there's a decent risk that the compiler
will optimise away important things..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists