[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1KO7OU-0007BT-Ff@wraith.cs.uow.edu.au>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:50:50 +1000
From: mcs6502@...il.com
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Subject: [patch 00/31] pci_ids.h, kernel 2.6.27-rc1, sort DEVICE_IDs within VENDOR_IDs
The following 31 patches attempt to bring pci_ids.h back into order.
patch-01-31: INTEL
patch-02-31: S2IO
patch-03-31: RDC
patch-04-31: ADDIDATA
patch-05-31: MELLANOX
patch-06-31: TIGON3
patch-07-31: TITAN
patch-08-31: SEALEVEL
patch-09-31: SIIG
patch-10-31: ITE
patch-11-31: ENSONIQ
patch-12-31: MARVELL
patch-13-31: SBE
patch-14-31: VIA
patch-15-31: NVIDIA
patch-16-31: CMD/SII
patch-17-31: QLOGIC
patch-18-31: YAMAHA
patch-19-31: MYLEX
patch-20-31: PROMISE
patch-21-31: HP
patch-22-31: SI
patch-23-31: MATROX
patch-24-31: TRIDENT
patch-25-31: AMD
patch-26-31: IBM
patch-27-31: DEC/COMPAQ
patch-28-31: NS
patch-29-31: LSI
patch-30-31: COMPAQ
patch-31-31: ESS
Note 1: I have not attempted a build with these changes. I have done
a sort -u on both the original and fully patched files and there
are only two lines that differ due to padding the ID number to
4 digits.
544c544
< #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_COMPAQ_CISSC 0x46
---
> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_COMPAQ_CISSC 0x0046
720c720
< #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_IBM_ICOM_FOUR_PORT_MODEL 0x252
---
> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_IBM_ICOM_FOUR_PORT_MODEL 0x0252
Note 2: I have not made any changes to the ATI section as this appears
to be sorted into chip families.
Note 3: I have not moved the following:
PCI_VENDOR_ID_TOSHIBA_2 (it is adjacent to PCI_VENDOR_ID_TOSHIBA)
PCI_DEVICE_ID_SEGA_BBA (it seems to be missing a PCI_VENDOR_ID_SEGA line)
PCI_VENDOR_ID_ADDIDATA_OLD (it is adjacent to PCI_VENDOR_ID_ADDIDATA)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists