[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080730095614.GA82@tv-sign.ru>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:56:14 +0400
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
To: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, jmorris@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Request for documentation of PID handling functions
On 07/30, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
>
> David Howells wrote:
> > Hi Pavel,
> >
> > Can you please provide documentation for the PID handling functions you
> > supplied in commit:
> >
> > 7af5729474b5b8ad385adadab78d6e723e7655a3
> >
> > In particular I'd like to know what locks are required when. I'm trying to
> > determine if in this piece of code:
> >
> > read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> > ret = 0;
> > if (pid != task_pid_vnr(current))
> > ret = -EPERM;
> > read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
> >
> > the lock of tasklist_lock is necessary.
>
> The RCU protection is enough to get pids from tasks. However, the pids
> are detached under the tasklist lock write-locked, so provided you're
> *already* sitting under it the RCU is excessive.
Yes, tasklist OR rcu is enough.
But, since the task == current, the code above doesn't need any locks at all.
Unless this code runs after exit_notify() of course, in that case we need
rcu/tasklist and task_pid_vnr(current) can return 0.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists