[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080730100926.GA10431@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:09:26 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mike Travis <travis@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC [PATCH] x86: introduce nr_irqs for 64bit
* Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
> add DEFINE_DYN_ARRAY for dynamical array support
>
> todo:
> 1. convert x86 32bit and other arch
> 2. nr_irqs auto probe via acpi_oem_check?
>
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
wonderful!
I have one main structural suggestion: could we please keep the NR_IRQS
name, and just change it to dynamic on x86? NR_IRQS is used in 540
places in the kernel, there's no point in touching all that code.
Also add an CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_DYNAMIC_NR_IRQS switch, define it in
arch/x86/Kconfig and use it in include/linux/irq.h.
This will create far less migration pain than the widespread rename.
That will also solve the "what about the other architectures" question.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists