[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86802c440807300316r5020b358r3334ccb38370c9e3@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 03:16:30 -0700
From: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
To: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"Dhaval Giani" <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Mike Travis" <travis@....com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC [PATCH] x86: introduce nr_irqs for 64bit
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 3:09 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> * Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> add DEFINE_DYN_ARRAY for dynamical array support
>>
>> todo:
>> 1. convert x86 32bit and other arch
>> 2. nr_irqs auto probe via acpi_oem_check?
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
>
> wonderful!
>
> I have one main structural suggestion: could we please keep the NR_IRQS
> name, and just change it to dynamic on x86? NR_IRQS is used in 540
> places in the kernel, there's no point in touching all that code.
>
> Also add an CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_DYNAMIC_NR_IRQS switch, define it in
> arch/x86/Kconfig and use it in include/linux/irq.h.
>
> This will create far less migration pain than the widespread rename.
> That will also solve the "what about the other architectures" question.
just send out v2.
long term, i hope to make all arch to use nr_irqs and probe it
earlier. and kill NR_IRQS
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists