linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.27-rc1 inconsistent lock state during boot time

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080730034443.748d9a19.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Wed, 30 Jul 2008 03:44:43 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	"jay kumar" <jaykumarks@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.27-rc1 inconsistent lock state during boot time

On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:07:14 +0530 "jay kumar" <jaykumarks@...il.com> wrote:

>          While  testing  2.6.27-rc1 ,  "inconsistent lock state"
> warning appeared at boot time
>          posting: dmesg  along with .config and hardware info.
> 
>          commit 6e86841d05f371b5b9b86ce76c02aaee83352298
>          Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
>          Date:   Mon Jul 28 19:40:31 2008 -0700
> 
> ..
> 
> [    7.317402] debug: unmapping init memory c0571000..c0625000
> [    7.324903]
> [    7.324904] =================================
> [    7.330825] [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
> [    7.335218] 2.6.27-rc1 #5
> [    7.337873] ---------------------------------
> [    7.342273] inconsistent {hardirq-on-W} -> {in-hardirq-W} usage.
> [    7.348325] swapper/0 [HC1[1]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] takes:
> [    7.353331]  (&port_lock_key){+-..}, at: [<c02e2eee>]
> serial8250_interrupt+0x6e/0x160
> [    7.361383] {hardirq-on-W} state was registered at:
> [    7.366303]   [<c0155b65>] __lock_acquire+0x3b5/0x12e0
> [    7.371559]   [<c0156b28>] lock_acquire+0x98/0xd0
> [    7.376383]   [<c0404be2>] _spin_lock+0x32/0x60
> [    7.381036]   [<c02e2a1d>] serial8250_startup+0x29d/0x640
> [    7.386559]   [<c02dda91>] uart_startup+0x51/0x170
> [    7.391471]   [<c02df58f>] uart_open+0xef/0x420
> [    7.396124]   [<c02c9599>] tty_open+0x159/0x300
> [    7.401396]   [<c01aac81>] chrdev_open+0x91/0x190
> [    7.406220]   [<c01a63d6>] __dentry_open+0xb6/0x230
> [    7.411220]   [<c01a6597>] nameidata_to_filp+0x47/0x60
> [    7.416481]   [<c01b30de>] do_filp_open+0x19e/0x710
> [    7.421480]   [<c01a61cd>] do_sys_open+0x4d/0xe0
> [    7.426218]   [<c01a62c9>] sys_open+0x29/0x40
> [    7.430698]   [<c0101146>] init_post+0x36/0x100
> [    7.435353]   [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
> [    7.439137] irq event stamp: 177720

Does this fix it?

From: Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@...glemail.com>

serial8250_startup() doesn't disable interrupts while taking the &up->port.lock
which might race against the interrupt handler serial8250_interrupt(), which
when entered, will deadlock waiting for the lock to be released.

Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@...il.com>
Tested-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
---

 drivers/serial/8250.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff -puN drivers/serial/8250.c~8250c-portlock-is-irq-safe drivers/serial/8250.c
--- a/drivers/serial/8250.c~8250c-portlock-is-irq-safe
+++ a/drivers/serial/8250.c
@@ -1885,7 +1885,7 @@ static int serial8250_startup(struct uar
 		 * the interrupt is enabled.  Delays are necessary to
 		 * allow register changes to become visible.
 		 */
-		spin_lock(&up->port.lock);
+		spin_lock_irqsave(&up->port.lock, flags);
 		if (up->port.flags & UPF_SHARE_IRQ)
 			disable_irq_nosync(up->port.irq);
 
@@ -1901,7 +1901,7 @@ static int serial8250_startup(struct uar
 
 		if (up->port.flags & UPF_SHARE_IRQ)
 			enable_irq(up->port.irq);
-		spin_unlock(&up->port.lock);
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&up->port.lock, flags);
 
 		/*
 		 * If the interrupt is not reasserted, setup a timer to
_

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/