[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <s5hiquns6gq.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:05:25 +0200
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Amanda McPherson <amanda@...pherson.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] A development process document
At Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:09:13 +0200 (CEST),
Jiri Kosina wrote:
>
> On Tue, 29 Jul 2008, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
>
> > +Over the next six to ten weeks, only patches which fix problems should be
> > +submitted to the mainline. On occasion a more significant change will be
> > +allowed, but such occasions are rare; developers who try to merge new
> > +features outside of the merge window tend to get an unfriendly reception.
> > +As a general rule, if you miss the merge window for a given feature, the
> > +best thing to do is to wait for the next development cycle.
>
> On the other hand, the drivers for completely new hardware (that has been
> totally unsupported by the kernel previously, so there is no possibility
> for introducing regressions) are still allowed even after -rc1, right?
>
> This might be worth explicit note here.
I see this argument often in different places.
IMO, the new driver should follow the rule, too, *in general*.
RC is an RC, not a beta. Of course, there can be exceptions,
though...
just my $0.02.
Takashi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists