linux-kernel - Re: 463 kernel developers missing!

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <489097A4.6000507@keyaccess.nl>
Date:	Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:32:36 +0200
From:	Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
CC:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>,
	Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@...il.com>,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
	Simon Arlott <simon@...e.lp0.eu>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 463 kernel developers missing!

On 30-07-08 17:32, Adrian Bunk wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 02:54:05PM +0200, Rene Herman wrote:

>> But let us leave this discussion be. It's not going anywhere anyway.
> 
> There's one thing where it might actually go further:
> 
> You actually have a good point here, and I'm not disagreeing with it.
> 
> I've added Linus to the recipients since stuff like e.g. Tested-by or 
> Bisected-by tags actually undermine what the DCE 1.1 update should
> have accomplished. So if DCE 1.1 (d) is considered to be legally 
> required for public indefinite storage of name and email address
> we have a problem here.

I was afraid you'd conclude that... Me, I conclude that we should just 
not do the "harvest all these addresses into a big file" thing that 
might make it more than a theoretical problem...

But that's just me.

Rene.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/