[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080730170948.GA18676@tv-sign.ru>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:09:48 +0400
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] wait_task_inactive: "improve" the returned value for ->nvcsw == 0
(on top of wait_task_inactive-dont-consider-task-nivcsw.patch)
wait_task_inactive() returns 1 when p->nvcsw == 0 || p->nvcsw == 1.
This means that two subsequent calls can return the same number while
the task was scheduled in between.
Change the code to return "nvcsw | LONG_MIN" instead of "nvcsw ?: 1",
now the overlap always needs LONG_MAX schedules.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
--- 27/kernel/sched.c~1_WTI_RET 2008-07-30 19:32:09.000000000 +0400
+++ 27/kernel/sched.c 2008-07-30 19:47:56.000000000 +0400
@@ -1923,7 +1923,7 @@ unsigned long wait_task_inactive(struct
on_rq = p->se.on_rq;
ncsw = 0;
if (!match_state || p->state == match_state)
- ncsw = p->nvcsw ?: 1;
+ ncsw = p->nvcsw | LONG_MIN; /* sets MSB */
task_rq_unlock(rq, &flags);
/*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists