| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:05:56 +0200 From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de> To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org> CC: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@...il.com>, Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Simon Arlott <simon@...e.lp0.eu>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: 463 kernel developers missing! Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 02:54:05PM +0200, Rene Herman wrote: >> You only certify anything when _you_ put your address in. Given that >> it's a very common occurence that not you but _others_ do, this does not >> mean a _single_ thing. Tested-by, Bisected-by, what have you... [...] > stuff like e.g. Tested-by or Bisected-by tags actually undermine what > the DCE 1.1 update should have accomplished. [...] Last time when I read a discussion about these tags, people at least at this side of the pond seemed to come to the conclusion that we ask testers for their consent if in doubt, before adding such a tag if they didn't do so themselves. (That's different from how we handle Acked-by: from fellow developers which we often imply from an informally given OK.) -- Stefan Richter -=====-==--- -=== ====- http://arcgraph.de/sr/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists