[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <488FC0AB.8010805@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 10:15:23 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: dipankar@...ibm.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul E McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RCU: implement rcu_read_[un]lock_preempt()
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Therefore we prefer APIs such as, get_cpu() etc.. that show intent and
> don;t like stuff you just now proposed of mixing intents. Because when
> changing the preemption model you might need different solution for
> different intents.
Alright, will convert to get_cpu(). Thanks for the explanation.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists