[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4890B153.6050305@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:22:11 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86: use arch/x86/include
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi x86 guys.
>>
>> It turned out to be easy to enable um to use arch/x86/include so here
>> is a git pull.
>
> hm, we have a _ton_ of changes to include files queued up already, so
> this is rather inconvenient.
Git *should* be able to track those changes across a rename and even
with a rename on one branch and changes on another; in my experience it
works well for filename renames, but git doesn't understand directory
renames at all, so new files do have to be moved to their new locations
manually.
> I missed the discussion on this, what's the point of renaming all these
> files?
I know there has been talk about this on and off for a long time (to get
all the arch code into arch/). I don't know if there are any mechanical
reasons for it, on top of that.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists