| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:29:00 -0600 From: Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca> To: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@....com> CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> Subject: Re: CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU on x86 Dimitri Sivanich wrote: > I've heard folks say that hotplug cpu is very reliable. I'm assuming > that's in the context of the x86 architecture. If so, how come > CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU is still listed as EXPERIMENTAL in arch/x86/Kconfig? > Should this be changed for the x86 architecture? > > config HOTPLUG_CPU > bool "Support for suspend on SMP and hot-pluggable CPUs (EXPERIMENTAL)" > depends on SMP && HOTPLUG && EXPERIMENTAL && !X86_VOYAGER Yes, it's a bit bizarre that something needed for suspending almost any current laptop is still marked as "experimental".. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists