[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.1.10.0807302334430.3768@jikos.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 23:38:42 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Amanda McPherson <amanda@...pherson.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] A development process document
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Roland Dreier wrote:
> I think Linus has said pretty explicitly that he is willing to merge new
> low-level hardware drivers at pretty much any stage, as long as they are
> obviously self-contained and can't break anything.
Well, I think I understand a little bit this fear of merging new driver
that "obviously can't break anything" in arbitrary stage od development.
See below.
> As an example of this, the UVC webcam driver was one of the very last
> things merged just before the final 2.6.26 release, very late in the
> release cycle.
If you have a hardware that hasn't been supported by the previous kernel
versions at all, then everything is fine, just no driver is bound to the
device, and the device doesn't work. If then -rc9 comes with a shiny new
driver for this hardware, it gets autoloaded. If it is buggy, your system
crashes. This is regression, right?
Nevertheless, I still think that merging new drivers as fast as possible
is a good thing (tm).
Thanks,
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists