| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0807301453510.3277@nehalem.linux-foundation.org> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:56:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> cc: jens.axboe@...cle.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, nickpiggin@...oo.com.au, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org Subject: Re: [patch v3] splice: fix race with page invalidation On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > You are being unfair: after having talked it over with Nick I > resubmitted this patch (not the same), which was added to -mm and > nobody complained then. Then it got thrown out of -mm during the merge > window because of a conflict, and then now I got around to > resubmitting it again. Ok, fair enough. I don't follow -mm myself (since as far as I'm concerned, a lot of the point of -mm is that Andrew takes a lot of load off me). So yes, it was unfair and yes, I'd never have reacted to it in -mm. But I'd really like to get that PG_uptodate bit just fixed - both wrt writeout errors and wrt truncate/holepunch. We had some similar issues wrt ext3 (?) inode buffers, where removing the uptodate bit actually ended up being a mistake. Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists