linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] greatly reduce SLOB external fragmentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0807301457020.3277@nehalem.linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:00:05 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Pekka J Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
cc:	Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	vegard.nossum@...il.com, hannes@...urebad.de
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] greatly reduce SLOB external fragmentation



On Thu, 31 Jul 2008, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> 
> Subject: [PATCH] binalloc: best-fit allocation with binning
> From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>

Shoot me now. 

> As suggested by Linus,

I'm happy to hear that the thing worked, but I'm not sure how happy I 
should be about yet _another_ allocator. Will it ever end?

But seriously, it looks simple and small enough, so in that sense there 
doesn't seem to be a problem. But I really don't look forward to another 
one of these, at least not without somebody deciding that yes, we can 
prune one of the old ones as never being better. Hmm?

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/