linux-kernel - Re: [Patch] fix ia64 build failure when CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080730.151826.58205352.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:18:26 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	bhutchings@...arflare.com
Cc:	tony.luck@...el.com, jgarzik@...hat.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, matthew@....cx, holt@....com,
	linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com
Subject: Re: [Patch] fix ia64 build failure when CONFIG_SFC=m

From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:35:29 +0100

> So far as I can see, hardly anyone is doing routing at 10G speeds on Linux.
> If they were, the horrible interaction with LRO would presumably have been
> found and fixed earlier.

This assumes a precise intersection between those doing 10G routing
and their using chips with LRO capable drivers.

All of the 10G equipment I have here and do testing on use drivers
that lack LRO support.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/