[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080731003558.965581a6.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:35:58 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: sparc32/gcc-3.4.5/ld-2.15 build failure
On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:16:03 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> linux-next builds (sparc32 defconfig) have been failing for some time
> like this:
>
> .tmp_kallsyms2.o(.rodata+0x0): In function `kallsyms_addresses':
> : relocation truncated to fit: R_SPARC_32 _text
> .tmp_kallsyms2.o(.rodata+0x4): In function `kallsyms_addresses':
> : relocation truncated to fit: R_SPARC_32 _text
> .tmp_kallsyms2.o(.rodata+0x8): In function `kallsyms_addresses':
> : relocation truncated to fit: R_SPARC_32 _text
>
> (several more)
>
> I finally bisected it down to this commit:
>
> commit f9247273cb69ba101877e946d2d83044409cc8c5
> Author: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>
> Date: Thu Jul 24 17:22:13 2008 +0100
>
> UFS: add const to parser token table
>
> Reverting this commit and the followup commit:
>
> commit fb2e405fc1fc8b20d9c78eaa1c7fd5a297efde43
> Author: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
> Date: Fri Jul 25 02:55:49 2008 +0300
>
> fix fs/nfs/nfsroot.c compilation
>
> allows the sparc32 build to succeed. This is toolchain specific as a
> different cross toolchain I have does not get this error.
>
> Failing toolchain:
>
> $ gcc-3.4.5-glibc-2.3.6/sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc --version
> sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc (GCC) 3.4.5
> $ gcc-3.4.5-glibc-2.3.6/sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu-ld --version
> GNU ld version 2.15
>
> An OK toolchain:
> $ cross/bin/sparc64-linux-gcc --version
> sparc64-linux-gcc (GCC) 4.2.4
> $ cross/bin/sparc64-linux-ld --version
> GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.18
>
> Both these commits are actually in Linus' tree, now.
gee. nfsroot.c is now effectively doing `const __initconst' which
might be upsetting the compiler. And perhaps one of the forty-odd
other users of match_table_t needs __initconst or somesuch.
Yes, I'd second a revert-and-try-again-later on that one.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists