[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0807311145070.31930@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:50:10 -0400 (EDT)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, stable@...nel.org,
greg@...ah.com, Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH stable] ftrace document crucial update
On Thu, 31 Jul 2008, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 23:05:02 -0400 (EDT)
> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> > Never mind that ftrace itself doesn't exist is 2.6.26.
s/is/in/ :-(
>
> I just figured you were trying to raise the bar by showing that it's
> possible to get the documentation in before the code...
I'd be impressed if this happens again. ;-)
>
> > Copyright 2008 Red Hat Inc.
> > -Author: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
> > + Author: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
> > + License: The GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2
>
> Is FDL appropriate for stuff shipped with the kernel? I would suspect
> it would at least need a GPL-compatible dual-license option.
Yeah, Christoph Hellwig brought this up too. I said that I would dual
license it (whatever that means with this) but I wanted to ask a lawyer
first.
The question is, is the FDL really incompatible with the GPL if what is
protected by the FDL does not get compiled and shipped as a binary?
Hence, I need to bring this up with a lawyer. And if it is indeed
incompatible, then I will be sending out a dual license patch.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists