[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48922293.9020007@am.sony.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:37:39 -0700
From: Tim Bird <tim.bird@...sony.com>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
CC: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org,
michael@...e-electrons.com, Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
matthew@....cx, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/4] Configure out file locking features
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 10:32:20AM -0700, Tim Bird wrote:
>> If warnings or support avoidance for the general population using
>> such config options is the issue, I think that David Woodhouse's
>> suggestion that such things could taint the kernel is an interesting
>> idea. Maybe have we could have an "unsafe-config" taint flag?
>
> A CONFIG_EMBEDDED=y flag?
If this is sufficient, it works for me!
> It's not only about limits, I also have a general dislike for the
> "add more config options" approach.
>
> I get your point why it brings advantages in some cases, but if you are
> looking for a cheerleader it won't be me. ;-)
Understood. I promise not to send you any pom-poms. ;-)
-- Tim
=============================
Tim Bird
Architecture Group Chair, CE Linux Forum
Senior Staff Engineer, Sony Corporation of America
=============================
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists