linux-kernel - Re: mlock() return value issue in kernel 2.6.23.17

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080801173122.FEC6.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Fri, 01 Aug 2008 17:56:55 +0900
From:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To:	"Halesh S" <halesh.s@...ia.com>
Cc:	kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, madhvesh.s@...sony.com,
	halesh.sadashiv@...sony.com
Subject: Re: mlock() return value issue in kernel 2.6.23.17

Hi

> Thanks everyone.
> I confirm that the patch fixes the issue with Rlimit and invalid address.
> 
> Signed-off-by: halesh.sadashiv@...sony.com

No.
your test program need run as root.
then, it doesn't test rlimit.




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/