[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080801120455.GP9663@sgi.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 07:04:55 -0500
From: Robin Holt <holt@....com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Robin Holt <holt@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>,
Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ibm.com>,
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch] Scale pidhash_shift/pidhash_size up based on
num_possible_cpus().
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 03:04:56PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Robin Holt <holt@....com> writes:
>
> > Like so???
> >
> > I have not tested this yet.
>
> Looks reasonable to me.
>
> In what circumstances was the lookup in the pid hash table with
> long changes causing a performance slowdown?. We don't perform
> a lot of lookups.
It was initially detected while profiling 'ps' on a 2048p machine that
had 13 kernel threads per cpu. We added a couple more device drivers
which added additional threads. We then started a pthread-on-process
MPI job which had 2048 ranks each with 4 threads (test-case from
customer job). There were misc other processes out there which brought
our task count up to approx 63k. Larger page size helped the problem
(went from 16k to 64k).
Thanks,
Robin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists