[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080801162712.63721e8c@surf>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 16:27:12 +0200
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>
To: Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Cedric Le Goater <clg@...ibm.com>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>,
Michael Opdenacker <michael@...e-electrons.com>,
linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] Container Freezer: Make refrigerator always
available
Hi,
Le Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:07:01 -0700,
Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com> a écrit :
> --- a/kernel/Makefile
> +++ b/kernel/Makefile
> @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
> obj-y = sched.o fork.o exec_domain.o panic.o printk.o \
> cpu.o exit.o itimer.o time.o softirq.o resource.o \
> sysctl.o capability.o ptrace.o timer.o user.o \
> - signal.o sys.o kmod.o workqueue.o pid.o \
> + signal.o sys.o kmod.o workqueue.o pid.o freezer.o \
I have the impression that the code in kernel/power/process.c was
compiled only if CONFIG_PM_SLEEP was set. Now that the code has been
moved to kernel/freezer.c, it is unconditionnaly compiled in every
kernel. Is that correct ?
If so, is it possible to put this new feature under some
CONFIG_SOMETHING option, for people who care about the kernel size ?
Thanks,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers and embedded Linux development,
consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists