[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1217611980.4000.10.camel@new-host-2>
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 13:33:00 -0400
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
safford@...son.ibm.com, serue@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
sailer@...son.ibm.com, zohar@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for July 31 (IMA build error)
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote on 08/01/2008 01:34:14 AM:
> security/integrity/ima:
>
> linux-next-20080731/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:81: error: implicit
> declaration of function 'security_audit_rule_match'
> linux-next-20080731/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:206: error: implicit
> declaration of function 'security_audit_rule_init'
> make[4]: *** [security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.o] Error 1
- Update security/integrity/ima/Kconfig for LSM based policy rules
to select CONFIG_AUDIT.
- Add dummy security_filter_rule_init/match routines for when
CONFIG_AUDIT is not configured.
Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ibm.com>
Index: security-testing-2.6/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig
===================================================================
--- security-testing-2.6.orig/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig
+++ security-testing-2.6/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig
@@ -39,3 +39,11 @@ config IMA_BASE_HOOKS
default n
help
Enable this option to allow the LSM module to enforce integrity.
+
+config IMA_LSM_BASED_RULES
+ bool "Enable LSM based measurement policy rules(requires audit)"
+ depends on IMA
+ select AUDIT
+ default y
+ help
+ Disabling this option will not enforce LSM based policy rules.
Index: security-testing-2.6/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
===================================================================
--- security-testing-2.6.orig/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
+++ security-testing-2.6/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
@@ -145,4 +145,25 @@ struct ima_iint_cache {
u8 digest[IMA_DIGEST_SIZE];
struct mutex mutex;
};
+
+/* LSM based policy rules require audit */
+#ifdef CONFIG_AUDIT
+
+#define security_filter_rule_init security_audit_rule_init
+#define security_filter_rule_match security_audit_rule_match
+
+#else
+
+static inline int security_filter_rule_init(u32 field, u32 op, char *rulestr,
+ void **lsmrule)
+{
+ return -EINVAL;
+}
+
+static inline int security_filter_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op,
+ void *lsmrule, struct audit_context *actx)
+{
+ return -EINVAL;
+}
+#endif
#endif
Index: security-testing-2.6/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
===================================================================
--- security-testing-2.6.orig/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ security-testing-2.6/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -20,9 +20,6 @@
#include "ima.h"
-#define security_filter_rule_init security_audit_rule_init
-#define security_filter_rule_match security_audit_rule_match
-
struct ima_measure_rule_entry {
struct list_head list;
int action;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists