linux-kernel - Re: ACPI OSI disaster on latest HP laptops

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0808011708010.3011@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Fri, 01 Aug 2008 17:08:08 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-acpi <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@...el.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	Christian Kornacker <ckornacker@...e.de>
Subject: Re: ACPI OSI disaster on latest HP laptops - critical temperature
 shutdown

[yet another resend]

On Sat, 26 Jul 2008, Len Brown wrote:

> 
> 
> On Fri, 25 Jul 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> > On Friday, 25 of July 2008, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> > > On Friday 25 July 2008 02:04:32 Len Brown wrote:
> > [--snip--]
> > > 
> > > Len, this is not about the thermal zone, it is just
> > > a real-world example of something I told you will happen
> > > if Linux stays _OSI transparent with Windows.
> > > 
> > > This is about that they have to provide a BIOS hot-fix for
> > > VISTA or VISTA SP and thus breaking Linux because there
> > > is no way to distinguish anymore.
> > > Windows 2007 likely will have that fixed and they provide
> > > a sane _CRT trip point again.
> > > This is an example of Windows versions workarounds that could
> > > get much more complex, like initializing HW differently or
> > > whatever.
> > > _OSI is used by vendors as a convenient possibility to
> > > adjust/workaround Windows bugs in their BIOSes, without
> > > the need to pay Millions to Microsoft to fix their things.
> > 
> > This is a valid point, IMO.
> > 
> > If vendors use _OSI(Windows) to work around Windows bugs, we get broken
> > automatically on those systems unless we put in some DMI-based hacks.
> 
> I belive that the AML Thomas shared does not
> illustrate a Vista bug workaround in a BIOS.
> Rather it is simply a BIOS bug that Vista doesn't catch.
> 
> -Len
> 
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/