linux-kernel - Checkpatch false positive?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1217566262.25300.188.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:51:02 -0700
From:	Matthew Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>
To:	Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>
Cc:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
	Joel Schopp <jschopp@...tin.ibm.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Checkpatch false positive?

Hello checkpatch.pl maintainers,

	I'm adding a new thread flag and I get this apparent checkpatch false
positive:


ERROR: do not modify files in include/asm, change architecture specific files in include/asm-<architecture>
#36: +++ linux-2.6.27-rc1-mm1/arch/sparc/include/asm/thread_info_32.h

ERROR: do not modify files in include/asm, change architecture specific files in include/asm-<architecture>
#63: +++ linux-2.6.27-rc1-mm1/arch/sparc/include/asm/thread_info_64.h

ERROR: do not modify files in include/asm, change architecture specific files in include/asm-<architecture>
#289: +++ linux-2.6.27-rc1-mm1/arch/parisc/include/asm/thread_info.h

patches/0001-Container-Freezer-Add-TIF_FREEZE-flag-to-all-archit.patch total: 3 errors, 0 warnings, 214 lines checked

patches/0001-Container-Freezer-Add-TIF_FREEZE-flag-to-all-archit.patch has style problems, please review.  If any of these errors
are false positives report them to the maintainer, see
CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.


	Which happens for every arch where the file has been moved under the
arch/ directory (sparc and parisc so far). Should this check for
arch/<foo>/include/asm before giving an ERROR? Should
arch/<foo>/include/asm only trigger a WARNING in this case?

Cheers,
	-Matt Helsley

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/