linux-kernel - Re: Linux 2.6.25.13

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080801063902.GA9281@suse.de>
Date:	Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:39:02 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	ml@...eichelt.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.25.13

On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 07:02:14AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> 
> [ please keep people in CC: ]
> 
> On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 01:22:35AM +0200, markus reichelt wrote:
> > * Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de> wrote:
> > 
> > > I'll also be replying to this message with a copy of the patch
> > > between 2.6.25.12 and 2.6.25.13
> > 
> > Given that the official patches are signed, how about signing such
> > mails as well?

With what key?

Do you trust my personal key?  If so, why?  What trust does it imply to
you that my email message doesn't?  Why not trust the signature on the
kernel.org server instead?

Also, it makes actually applying patches in the mail a pain, trust me,
I've tried it in the past.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/