[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200808010935.05949.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 09:35:04 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Greg Ungerer <gerg@...pgear.com>,
linux arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux/m68k <linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org>,
uClinux list <uclinux-dev@...inux.org>
Subject: Re: kbuild now support arch/$ARCH/include - time for ARCHs to convert
On Thursday 31 July 2008, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > #ifdef __KERNEL__
> > #ifdef CONFIG_MMU
> > #include "${BASE}_mmu.h"
> > #else
> > #include "${BASE}_nommu.h"
> > #endif
> > #else
> > #include "${BASE}_mmu.h"
> > #endif
> > EOF
> > }
>
> This will leak a CONFIG_ symbol if the header file
> is exported. Can we do it with a gcc defined symbol?
> [See how I did it for sparc for instance]
Is there a compiler defined symbol for this? I thought the tool
chain was identical. Do you think my #ifdef __KERNEL__ does
not do what I wanted it to do? It should make sure that
user space always sees the _mmu variant.
Arnd <><
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists