linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/5] x86: Coding style fixes to arch/x86/kernel/bios

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4d8e3fd30808030521t351a8564yfb93211f7239613c@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 3 Aug 2008 14:21:25 +0200
From:	"Paolo Ciarrocchi" <paolo.ciarrocchi@...il.com>
To:	"Krzysztof Halasa" <khc@...waw.pl>
Cc:	"Stefan Richter" <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"Linux Kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	tglx <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] x86: Coding style fixes to arch/x86/kernel/bios_uv.c

On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl> wrote:
[...]
> Right. The latter is much worse. That's why nobody can trust
> CodingStyle and/or checkpatch automatically. It's only sane mode
> of operation is as a help tool for authors and maintainers, to
> quickly locate _potential_ problems.

_much worse_? Wow, I thought the opposite.
Anyway, that's just a coding style patch, feel free to simply not apply it as
it's really a matter of personal taste but be sure that I'm not
blindly changing the code
accordingly to checkpatch. That might be almost true when I started
doing this kind of patches months
ago but it's definitely not true anymore.

Thanks.

regards,
-- 
Paolo
http://paolo.ciarrocchi.googlepages.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/