linux-kernel - [rfc-patch, bugfix] x86-microcode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1217778135.4912.40.camel@earth>
Date:	Sun, 03 Aug 2008 17:42:15 +0200
From:	Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Tigran Aivazian <tigran@...azian.fsnet.co.uk>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@....com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Max Krasnyansky <maxk@...lcomm.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [rfc-patch, bugfix] x86-microcode

Hi,

[ consider it a pre-release and RFC... I'm a bit in hurry now and just send what I have got by this moment.
Although, I expect it to be workable ]

this change is supposed to fix bug#11197 (note, its name "Oops in microcode sysfs registration" is misleading)

The problem description can be found here:
http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0807.3/3791.html
or
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/24/260

perhaps it does look quite bulky for -rc, although it's mainly move-redesign-some-bits of the code and
I tried to preserve the original logic (even if it looked like a possible optimizations might had been applied)
as much as possible.

The basic idea is that we introduce another mechanism to run ucode-updates on a target cpu
and replace set_cpus_allowed_ptr() in (1) cpu-hotplug events and (2) module load.

[1/2] x86-microcode: generic updates

Basically, it introduces microcode_update_cpu() which can be run either from start_secondary()
(perhaps via a function pointer) or scheduled via keventd ([2/2]) and reworks the logic of cpu-hotplug events.

[2/2] x86-microcode: do updates via workqueue

More testing is necessary. I tested without ucode-package (so only generic machinery) and for
- load/unload module;
- cpu-hotplug (so it doesn't give an oops anymore)

hm, suspend/resume seems to be broken even without the 'microcode' module (will check the date of my previous kernel).

--Dmitry

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/