[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1myjuadmh.fsf@frodo.ebiederm.org>
Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 22:09:26 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mike Travis <travis@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: 64bit support more than 256 irq v2
Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com> writes:
> Dhaval Giani got:
> kernel BUG at arch/x86/kernel/io_apic_64.c:357!
> invalid opcode: 0000 [1] SMP
> CPU 24
> ...
>
> his system (x3950) has 8 ioapic, irq > 256
>
> caused by
> commit 9b7dc567d03d74a1fbae84e88949b6a60d922d82
> Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Date: Fri May 2 20:10:09 2008 +0200
>
> x86: unify interrupt vector defines
>
> The interrupt vector defines are copied 4 times around with minimal
> differences. Move them all into asm-x86/irq_vectors.h
>
> because 64bit allow same vector for different cpu to serve different irq
>
> need to create that array dynamically later
YH Thank you for splitting this out. This still doesn't restore the
pre merge NR_IRQS heuristic. So I don't think it is a proper regression fix.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists