| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4896CB17.8050701@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 18:25:43 +0900 From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> To: Satish Eerpini <eerpini@...il.com> CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Kernel Installer Satish Eerpini wrote: >> Replacing the normal build output with something different doesn't make >> anything easier. >> >> Especially considering that your "once the .config file is set" seems to >> assume the user already configured the kernel himself... >> > > i am not just trying to replace the output , i am not a stupid to > waste my weekend sitting just to replace the output :-), > if u are interested , u can check out the entire TODO for the app here > http://satish.playdrupal.com/?q=node/2 > > but in the process i am stuck at deciding the no of files that will be > compiled , given that representing the entire compilation > process as a progress bar , would give a clear idea of " how much is > over" and "how much is left" !!! make -n makes make do a dry-run but kbuild is a pretty complex beast and you might have to jump through some loops to get the information you want. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists