[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080804152146.GG18868@shareable.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 16:21:46 +0100
From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Mel Gorman <mel@...net.ie>,
andi@...stfloor.org, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: No, really, stop trying to delete slab until you've finished making slub perform as well
Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Vaguely on this topic, has anyone studied the effects of SLAB/SLUB
> etc. on MMUless systems?
The reason is that MMU-less systems are extremely sensitive to
fragmentation. Every program started on those systems must allocate a
large contiguous block for the code and data, and every malloc >1 page
is the same. If memory is too fragmented, starting new programs fails.
The high-order page-allocator defragmentation lately should help with
that.
The different behaviours of SLAB/SLUB might result in different levels
of fragmentation, so I wonder if anyone has compared them on MMU-less
systems or fragmentation-sensitive workloads on general systems.
Thanks,
-- Jamie
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists