[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48975C96.9090401@shaw.ca>
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 13:46:30 -0600
From: Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>
To: Bernd Schubert <bs@...eap.de>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sysrq+t doesn't work for some threads
Bernd Schubert wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I need to debug a lustre problem, where lustre threads take 100% cpu time and
> also have a memory leak. The problem is, that sysrq+t doesn't work for these
> threads. It nicely shows all stack traces, just the trouble some threads
> won't show their traces:
>
> [69338.858825] ll_mdt_36 R running task 0 21679 2 (L-TLB)
This means this task is running, you won't get a stack trace for such a
thread. You'd likely have to stop it somehow. Is this a kernel thread?
> [69338.865689] ll_mdt_37 S 0000000000000000 0 21680 2 (L-TLB)
> [69338.872676] ffff8102e6d01dd0 0000000000000046 ffffffff88160325
> 00000000ffffffed
> [69338.880544] 0000000000000000 ffffffff8815e016 000000000000000a
> ffff810322ef4ea0
> [69338.888318] ffff81031e7477b0 00003f0797609cef 000000000003434e
> ffff810322ef5050
> [69338.895957] Call Trace:
> [69338.898787] [<ffffffff8828cab5>] :ptlrpc:ptlrpc_main+0xa55/0x1ce0
> [69338.905297] [<ffffffff8020a2f8>] child_rip+0xa/0x12
>
>
> But I really need to have the trace of ll_mdt_36, which is one of the
> troublesome threads. Might this be a problem of the x86_64-mm-unwinder.patch
> we always apply since it provides much better traces?
> This is with 2.6.22.19.
>
> Any help would be appreciated.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists