[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080804003206.GB6119@disturbed>
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 10:32:06 +1000
From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>, Michael Shuey <shuey@...due.edu>,
Shehjar Tikoo <shehjart@....unsw.edu.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
rees@...i.umich.edu, aglo@...i.umich.edu
Subject: Re: high latency NFS
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 03:15:59PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 05:23:20PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 05:03:05PM +1000, Neil Brown wrote:
> > > You might want to track the max length of the request queue too and
> > > start more threads if the queue is long, to allow a quick ramp-up.
> >
> > Right, but even request queue depth is not a good indicator. You
> > need to leep track of how many NFSDs are actually doing useful
> > work. That is, if you've got an NFSD on the CPU that is hitting
> > the cache and not blocking, you don't need more NFSDs to handle
> > that load because they can't do any more work than the NFSD
> > that is currently running is.
> >
> > i.e. take the solution that Greg banks used for the CPU scheduler
> > overload issue (limiting the number of nfsds woken but not yet on
> > the CPU),
>
> I don't remember that, or wasn't watching when it happened.... Do you
> have a pointer?
Ah, I thought that had been sent to mainline because it was
mentioned in his LCA talk at the start of the year. Slides
65-67 here:
http://mirror.linux.org.au/pub/linux.conf.au/2007/video/talks/41.pdf
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists